Blockers by position, months early
Each event carries two faces: the removed part and the installed part. A missing face on MLG LH blocks the transition today, not at the inspection.
Lease assets, delivery and redelivery transitions, and portfolio analytics on the same aircraft record the CAMO maintains — so the redelivery inspector finds nothing the lessor did not already see.
For the lessor's technical manager who owns the asset, and the transition lead who has to hand it back.


Each event carries two faces: the removed part and the installed part. A missing face on MLG LH blocks the transition today, not at the inspection.
Delivery, operation and redelivery run on the same aircraft record the CAMO maintains. No monthly report, no reconciliation.
Values extracted from the documents on one event are compared; discrepancies are raised as findings before the lessee's inspector finds them.
Every event has two faces. A missing face is visible today, not at the inspection.
12-Mar-2023 · TC-AXGmaster records by positionAviator Airlines · 3.5 yearsthe CAMO keeps the record14 / 16 positions · 96.4%recalculated nightly2 · MLG LH, APUnamed by position31-Mar-2027 · 194 daysreturn conditions rev. CWE-0298completeWE-0298completeWE-0305completeWE-0305missing: TSN/CSN at installWE-0305completeWE-0311missing: removal record
Delivery and redelivery transitions with per-position master record completeness: both faces of every event, removed part and installed part, checked position by position. A missing face on MLG LH blocks the transition today and says which position; metrics are recalculated nightly.

Cross-document comparison of the records attached to one workflow event: values AI extracted from each document compared against each other, scored by a severity matrix and raised as findings. The lessee's inspector should not be the first to notice that two documents disagree.

| Module | Primary job | Signals |
|---|---|---|
| Assets Overview | Lease asset lifecycle | technical state, not a reportlifecycle dashboard |
| Transitions | Delivery and redelivery readiness | two faces per positionblocks early, by position |
| Portfolio | Yield and reserve analytics | yield analyticsreserve vs next check |
| Comparison | Cross-document discrepancy detection | title vs replacementseverity matrix |
Lease assets and their lifecycle on one dashboard, with the technical state pulled from the CAMO workspace rather than reported by email. Owners, operators and lessors see the same aircraft through their own entitlement.
Delivery and redelivery transitions with per-position master record completeness: both faces of every event, removed part and installed part, checked position by position. A missing face on MLG LH blocks the transition today and says which position; metrics are recalculated nightly.
Portfolio and yield analytics across owners and operators, with maintenance reserve accruals against the next heavy check and readiness colour per aircraft. Filtered by what each viewer is allowed to see.
Cross-document comparison of the records attached to one workflow event: values AI extracted from each document compared against each other, scored by a severity matrix and raised as findings. The lessee's inspector should not be the first to notice that two documents disagree.
The questions this workspace gets asked most often.
It follows the asset through delivery, operation and redelivery, and reports on the portfolio behind it. Because the lease workspace reads the same aircraft record the CAMO maintains, the lessor is not asking the operator for a status that a system already knows.
Months before the inspection. Master record completeness is derived after every event and reported per position, so a missing document on one landing gear position is a visible blocker during normal operation rather than a discovery during the handback.
Because a ship-set is not one part. A narrowbody landing gear set is three positions, each with a removed part and a replacement, so completeness reported as a single figure hides exactly the gap that matters. Each position answers for itself.
Yes — one record, read by both. The lessor does not maintain a parallel copy that drifts from the operator's, which is the usual reason a redelivery negotiation turns into a reconciliation of two spreadsheets.
Bring an aircraft with a lease end in the next twelve months. We map its events, show master record completeness by position and the return-condition gaps.